December 2008
Monthly Archive
Monthly Archive
Changes to governance and compliance requirements over the past decade have placed greater demands on boards. One of the consequences of those changes is that the role of the Company Secretary is evolving from an administrative/compliance function to embrace a broader leadership and strategic role, and to play a crucial part in linking the board and management.
Company Secretaries are becoming more involved in developing the board’s process, to enable the board to be more effective.
This evolution can be challenging and exciting, and requires Company Secretaries to develop an expanded skill set and a different way of thinking, influencing and communicating.
A study by Chartered Secretaries Australia in 2004 identified the top 5 responsibilities of Company Secretaries as:
One of the key skills that highly effective Company Secretaries must possess, or develop, in order to carry out those roles, is the skill of asking the right questions.
Little training available for questioning skills in business: Incredibly, as important as it is to be able to ask questions in business, business schools do not teach the skill of knowing when to ask a question and which question to ask.
Although the legal profession is well represented among Company Secretaries,
legal education generally does not include questioning skills, especially the skill of asking questions on non-technical issues, which form by far the majority of issues both in and out of legal practice.
Most ‘at risk’ business communication deals with subjective reality: The majority of written and verbal communications in business relates to facts, strategy, solutions, beliefs, opinions, assumptions, perceptions and interpretations. Many ‘facts’ are, in reality, beliefs, assumptions, opinions and interpretations wrapped in language that is designed to appear factual, but which is actually a representation of personal, subjective reality that often bears little resemblance to the truth.
Unfortunately, many decisions at all levels of management are based on that type of ‘fact’, and result in financial loss for the company, job losses for employees and loss of share value, especially when those decisions are made at executive and board levels.
Many, if not most, of those losses could be avoided, if the right questions are asked.
One-Tel and NAB are two recent Australian examples where the right questions might have made a significant difference. One-Tel disappeared; and NAB lost $360m, its principal executives and most of its board members as a result of its currency trading debacle. And, of course, HIH developed a culture (reflecting the leadership style) that strongly discouraged questioning what was done at the top, and finally imploded, impacting many thousands of families and businesses and almost bringing the residential building industry to its knees.
Questioning skills are time- and cost-effective, and high ROI: The pity of all this is that it is so easy to ask the right questions. They only take a few seconds to ask and can save a great deal of money, time and effort.
Why aren’t the right questions asked more often? Generally, questions are not asked because the opportunity and need for a question is not recognised. There are a dozen or so patterns of language commonly used in business that demand questions. I can guarantee that those patterns, and the risks associated with not challenging them, are present at every board, executive and management meeting. The fact is that most business leaders are only vaguely aware (if at all) of those patterns, and how to challenge them. However, the most highly effective business leaders are very aware of those patterns, and know the questions that challenge or counter those patterns.
Test yourself: Consider the following example:
“At the time of writing, [global] trading operations continue to manage risk responsibly in changing market conditions. Adherence to risk discipline is good.”
On first reading, would you ask any questions? Or would you pass on to the next item on the agenda?
Look at the quote again. They are the sentences written in a report* to the NAB’s Risk Management Executive Committee in November 2003, not long before the NAB discovered that it’s trading desk had lost $360 million – roughly 10% of the Bank’s annual profit.
There are at least 8 elements of those two sentences that, individually (and in combination), might be of interest to a Director or Executive – patterns of language that can very easily and subtly slide your mind away from the key issues that, as a caretaker of the company’s assets and brand/business, you must be vigilant in considering. Patterns that set alarm bells ringing.
Did you spot the eight?
One shot at asking a question: It is critical to be able to identify, at normal speech speed and in the midst of a lengthy conversation, the language cues that flag potential problems. If you have to pause and think about what the 8 elements are, you’ll stand little chance during a normal conversation or whilst scanning documents.
Have you spotted the 8 yet? If so, (or even if not), what now? Having identified the 8 elements, how, specifically, will you tackle the language and deal with the issues raised by those 8 items. Which of the items will you tackle? How will you do that in a few seconds, and effectively? Which will you tackle first, second or third so that the potential problem is identified and a risk strategy implemented to prevent the problems causing damage? How do you do that in a way that works best?
The value of an effective Company Secretary: Company Secretaries are ideally placed to ask the right questions and positively impact the success of the board, executive team and business. These days, they often have access to the board/chairman, the executive team, to meeting agendas and decision-making processes in a way that was not possible a couple of decades ago.
One Company Secretary, whom I’ve known for some years, takes the view that his duties include asking the questions that will assist the board and executive team to be properly informed, so that they can make informed decisions. He considers that to be necessary to enable the board to comply with their legal duties, and also to ensure that the business is as effective and competitive as possible.
He works both behind the scenes and in meetings to effect that outcome, quietly and unobtrusively. For instance, if he spots a possible flaw, ambiguity or omission in board papers submitted for an agenda item, he may contact the author and ask questions that enable the defect to be corrected prior to a formal meeting; or chat with the Chairman and highlight the issue if the Chairman has not spotted it. He doesn’t play politics, is objective, even-handed and respectfully assertive. As a result, he has the respect of the company’s leaders and has been instrumental in saving the company many millions of dollars, as well as making the board and executives’ jobs easier.
There is a simple art to asking the right questions that make a real difference, every day, in every business. It is an art that has such impressive and immediate benefits that I call them Powerful Questions that Every Director, Executive and Manager Must Ask.
comments off Christo | Communication, Governance, Questions